As I said, it just felt like it was missing something. They even had to change her name because Ty's real sister was so different from Bank's character in the movie. And it seems most of her character was fictional. She is super cute in this movie but has a couple of cringe moments. Lastly, Elizbeth Banks can be hit or miss in her movies. Similarly, Geraldine Viswanathan is a good actor but felt out of place here, and she was more of a way to move the plot along than an actual character most of the time (and mostly fictional). Also, it feels like Galifianakis was using this movie to make a comeback which seemed strange. Zach Galifianakis seems like a strange choice to play TY, as the real-life TY was somewhat of a recluse, unlike Galifianakis. "And then we developed this idea of wanting to tell more of a fable and a universal story." Also, the cast is a mixed bag. "It went through many drafts," said Kristin. Director Kristin Gore and Damian Kulash explained why they needed to make some key changes to real-life events. For one, the filmmakers changed some details to fit the story they wanted to tell. However, this movie just felt like it was missing something. It is also worth noting that this movie is from the perspective of the people behind the Beanie Babies and not the collectors. Now that doesn't mean that there can't be an effective film about this story too. However, this story was already told fairly effectively in the documentary Beanie Mania with the people who actually lived it. So, it is no surprise that nostalgia for the 90s would make people want to relive this crazy. As a little kid, I remember everyone wanting them and seeing them all over. For those living in the 90s, Beanie Babies were all the craze.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |